Wrong Again

Space/Science » in reply to Correction: If dinosaurs had a NEO program, they'd still be here.

Wrong Again

Mark Eby — 3/11/2002 12:58:53 PM (archived)

You can't do much about impacts just by watching them through telescopes. Pretty hard to waste money on your lunar observatory obsession as well without a space program.

The whole thread (46 posts)

April Popular Science - McFly - 3/10/2002 4:06:12 PM
- Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money - E.P. Grondine - 3/11/2002 6:00:52 PM
  - Of course, the majority of Americans also - LJ - 3/12/2002 4:51:35 PM
    - Re: Of course, the majority of Americans also - gbaikie - 3/12/2002 1:22:48 PM
  - Re: Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money - p - 3/11/2002 7:25:23 PM
  - Re: Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money - Mark Eby - 3/11/2002 12:56:47 PM
    - Re: Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money - Nathan Koren - 3/11/2002 7:01:55 PM
      - Orlando Sentinal Poll's Biases - E.P. Grondine - 3/12/2002 3:39:42 PM
    - Re: Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money - gbaikie - 3/11/2002 4:14:43 PM
    - Orlando Sentinel poll results *ARE* online - Keith Cowing - 3/11/2002 4:11:30 PM
    - Good questions - E.P. Grondine - 3/11/2002 3:59:04 PM
      - Good Answers But - Mark Eby - 3/12/2002 2:01:37 PM
        
        Re: Good Answers But - gbaikie - 3/12/2002 3:55:35 PM
        
        Mars, moon or NEO? - p - 3/13/2002 4:13:28 PM
        
        Re: Mars, moon or NEO? - gbaikie - 3/13/2002 8:19:57 PM
        
        Re: Mars, moon or NEO? - p - 3/13/2002 8:49:44 PM
        
        Re: Mars, moon or NEO? - gbaikie - 3/13/2002 10:00:33 AM
        
        Re: Mars, moon or NEO? - p - 3/13/2002 10:29:25 AM
        
        Re: Mars, moon or NEO? - gbaikie - 3/13/2002 4:41:45 PM
        
        Aerospace R&D costs a lot more than you think - Larry J - 3/13/2002 10:28:33 AM
        
        Re: Aerospace R&D costs a lot more than you think - gbaikie - 3/13/2002 3:17:32 PM
        
        Re: Aerospace R&D costs a lot more than you think - Larry J - 3/14/2002 3:28:28 PM
        
        Re: Aerospace R&D costs a lot more than you think - p - 3/13/2002 10:38:13 AM
        
        Space rated computers cost a bundle - Larry J - 3/13/2002 11:15:28 AM
        
        What's the point? - E.P. Grondine - 3/13/2002 7:50:38 PM
- "If the dinosaurs had a space program, they'd still be here" - p - 3/11/2002 5:17:04 PM
  - Correction: If dinosaurs had a NEO program, they'd still be here. - E.P. Grondine - 3/11/2002 5:53:05 PM
    - Re: Correction: If dinosaurs had a NEO program, they'd still be here. - Chris Vancil - 3/12/2002 11:34:46 AM
    - Wrong Again - Mark Eby - 3/11/2002 12:58:53 PM
- Re: April Popular Science - p - 3/11/2002 1:41:36 PM
- I agree with number four. - Lee - 3/10/2002 6:33:40 PM
  - Someone else is thinking the same thing - Lee - 3/11/2002 6:19:56 PM
    - I question their thinking - p - 3/11/2002 7:22:15 PM
      - Horizontal integration has some advantages - Larry J - 3/11/2002 8:32:10 PM
        
        Re: VAB - Raoul - 3/11/2002 8:46:47 PM
        
        horizontal FUELING cited in the article - p - 3/11/2002 9:54:52 AM
        
        You're right - Larry J - 3/12/2002 10:57:13 AM
        
        Yes! Just Do It! :) (n/t) (n/t) - p - 3/13/2002 2:24:28 PM
        
        Give me a few billion dollars and a few years... - Larry J - 3/13/2002 4:53:58 PM
    - Shuttle mods - Tom Brosz - 3/11/2002 10:04:41 AM
  - Re: I agree with number four. - Larry J - 3/11/2002 4:08:19 PM
  - Oops - Lee - 3/10/2002 6:39:20 PM
    - One more try! - Lee - 3/10/2002 6:43:36 PM
      - You need to add an 'a' & a space before the href... - Larry J - 3/11/2002 3:51:44 PM
        
        Yeah, that's the ticket.....thanks. (n/t) - Lee - 3/11/2002 6:06:32 PM
        
        Yeah, that's the ticket.....thanks. (n/t) - Lee - 3/11/2002 6:05:46 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (46 posts)