I agree with Mr. Aldrin in <href=http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviation/article/0,12543,216204-6,00.html> number four
"The solution, according to Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin, is to stick with the two-stage launch system but improve on it incrementally. The agency could start by creating more advanced boosters, and only later—when technology and funds allow—develop state-of-the-art vehicles for them to propel."
The shuttle lay out is sound and well proven, why not redisign and build a new generation shuttle using the latest technology and materials. The most expensive cost of the shuttle is it's heat tiles. It requires a vast amount of time and money replacing them after missions. The heat tiles created for the X-33 have been cleared for flight, and are far more cost effective. Replace the heavy hydraulic systems for atmospheric control with fly by wire technology. This would save alot of weight. Make the shuttle more aerodynamic, cutting down on fuel cost at launch. There are may other improvements that could be done as well.
Lee, (incrementalism is the surest way to go)
Space/Science » in reply to April Popular Science
I agree with number four.
The whole thread (46 posts)
- April Popular Science
- Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money
- Of course, the majority of Americans also
- Re: Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money
- Re: Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money
- Re: Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money
- Re: Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money
- Orlando Sentinel poll results *ARE* online
- Good questions
- "If the dinosaurs had a space program, they'd still be here"
- Re: April Popular Science
- I agree with number four.
- Orlando Sentinal Poll: Majority think manned Mars mission a waste of money
