Re: Ya got me...

Space/Science » in reply to Ya got me...

Re: Ya got me...

SDAI-Tech1 — 4/25/2002 5:28:00 PM (archived)

Hi Tom,

Yes,

I debated quite a bit before putting it up. There's enough space BS to filter without my adding to the pile. I'll be nuking it in about 12 hours or so, so it is not likely to be stumbled upon by the innocent netsurfers and then make some unsuspecting appearances on creationist websites with a life of it's own.

In the internet age - your attitude is the right one - pure skepticism. I am very skeptical of all the news (unreal and real) that is put out for consumption.

It is all too easy for anyone to present opinion as fact, junk science, political views, etc. and the public had better beware.

It's like a huge global circus sideshow out there - and discerning truth from fantasy is solely the responsibility of the viewer.

Having fun...

SDAI-Tech1

The whole thread (34 posts)

This looks like some bad news... - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/25/2002 12:55:33 PM
- Balony - Scott - 4/26/2002 4:28:07 PM
- Implications of Hoffman's observation on the effect of the Moon on Earth - E.P. Grondine - 4/26/2002 4:13:35 PM
  - Re: I havfe to say yes . . . - D. Spires - 4/26/2002 10:56:26 AM
    - You're wong...... Again. - Todd - 4/27/2002 10:58:06 AM
      - Re: You're wong...... Again. About the tides too. - Nathan - 4/27/2002 4:29:42 PM
        
        You guys are both wrong:) - gbaikie - 4/27/2002 3:34:22 PM
        
        Re: You guys are both wrong:) - Nathan - 4/27/2002 4:29:33 PM
        
        Newton's law... - Nick Hoffman - 4/28/2002 11:18:20 AM
        
        Re: Newton's law... - gbaikie - 4/28/2002 9:25:48 AM
        
        Centre of Gravity - Nick Hoffman - 4/28/2002 11:04:48 AM
        
        Re: Centre of Gravity - gbaikie - 4/28/2002 12:20:01 PM
        
        Re: You guys are both wrong:) - nathan - 4/27/2002 4:44:08 PM
      - Re: You're wong...... Again. And technically so are you. - nathan - 4/27/2002 4:15:25 PM
        
        Moon's effect on core convection currents? - E.P.Grondine - 4/27/2002 8:35:51 AM
        
        Earth tides and dissipation - Nick Hoffman - 4/27/2002 2:24:50 PM
        
        Re: Well, you certainly know how to shorten an argument . . . - D. Spires - 4/29/2002 6:51:36 PM
        
        Re: Well, you certainly know how to shorten an argument . . . yep, he sure does! :) - Marcia - 4/30/2002 10:38:42 AM
        
        Re: The Moon has achieved Earth-escape velocity . . . - D. Spires - 5/2/2002 9:40:01 AM
        
        Yes, sir. :) n/t (n/t) - Marcia - 5/4/2002 7:12:13 PM
        
        So if I understand you correctly: If I can wait 50 million years - Scott - 4/29/2002 5:40:57 PM
        
        Thanks - E.P. Grondine - 4/28/2002 5:29:54 PM
        
        it's not covered - Nick Hoffman - 4/28/2002 11:16:27 AM
        
        Thanks, but - E.P. Grondine - 4/28/2002 6:59:34 PM
      - Re: Nice to see you at least went to school . . . - D. Spires - 4/27/2002 8:43:18 AM
        
        Tidal effects on Earth...a couple of cents worth - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2002 12:03:40 PM
- Re: This looks like a load of horse manure - Tom Brosz - 4/25/2002 4:11:49 PM
  - I agree. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/25/2002 4:46:24 PM
    - Ya got me... - Tom Brosz - 4/25/2002 4:48:37 PM
      - Re: Ya got me... - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/25/2002 5:28:00 PM
        
        I say let it go. - Scott - 4/26/2002 4:30:51 PM
  - Perfectly clear: The key is the 2.0736 x 10^6 second chronological displacement (n/t) (n/t) - Robert - 4/25/2002 4:17:18 PM
- Re: This looks like some bad news... - Futureboy - 4/25/2002 3:56:35 PM
- I think it works both ways. - Todd - 4/25/2002 3:24:33 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (34 posts)