The ability to accurately recall visual events varies greatly from person to person. Case in point, the daytime crash of flight 587 in N.Y. According to the most recent NTSB update on the crash, 349 witnesses reported the following:
· 52% specifically reported seeing a fire while the plane was in the air, with the fuselage being the most often cited location (22%). Other areas cited as a fire location were the left engine, the right engine or an unspecified engine, and the left wing, the right wing or an unspecified wing.
· 8% specifically reported seeing an explosion.
· 20% specifically reported seeing no fire at all.
· 22% reported observing smoke; 20% reported no smoke.
· 18% reported observing the airplane in a right turn; another 18% reported observing the airplane in a left turn.
· 13% observed the airplane "wobbling," dipping" or in "side to side" motion.
· 74% observed the airplane descend.
· 57% reported seeing "something" separate from the airplane; 13% reported observing the right wing, left wing or an undefined wing separate; 9% specifically reported observing no parts separate.
The only factual part the witnesses agree on is that the plane descended.
(granted, the data would have more meaning if it were presented with the location of the witness relative to the plane)
Space/Science » in reply to Re: I believe that was the old Denver sighting . . . ?
Powers of observation
