You'd probably want to use hypergolics instead of LH/LOX

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Shuttle fuel and Buran

Larry J — 11/26/2002 11:13:57 AM (archived)

It'd be a lot easier and safer to add tanks to carry additional hypergolic propellants for the OMS engines than cyrogenics for the SSMEs. It could be done but I don't know if it would be worthwhile.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Shuttle to the rescue? - Lee - 11/26/2002 8:33:30 PM
- Almost certainly in an unreachable orbit - Larry J - 11/26/2002 2:32:00 PM
  - I wasn't talking about the current mission - Lee - 11/26/2002 8:40:57 PM
    - Yes, they did it a few times in the 1980s - Larry J - 11/26/2002 11:24:03 AM
  - Shuttle fuel - LJ - 11/26/2002 4:24:13 PM
    - Re: Shuttle fuel and Buran - Nick Hoffman - 11/26/2002 5:49:43 PM
      - Re: Shuttle fuel and Buran - O'Neil - 11/26/2002 11:24:57 AM
      - You'd probably want to use hypergolics instead of LH/LOX - Larry J - 11/26/2002 11:13:57 AM
        
        While we're on the subject. - O'Neil - 11/26/2002 12:04:45 PM
    - It could be done if you're talking about additional OMS propellant - Larry J - 11/26/2002 11:20:30 AM
- Re: Shuttle to the rescue? - MrPex - 11/26/2002 11:08:22 AM
  - Re: Shuttle to the rescue? - grok - 11/26/2002 11:55:52 AM
    - No coincidence there, the two "Z" modules came from the same launch complex. (n/t) (n/t) - ectoterrestrial - 11/26/2002 7:25:42 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (13 posts)