Space/Science » in reply to NASA now claiming debris not enough to cause damage??

The whole thread (22 posts)

• NASA now claiming debris not enough to cause damage?? - R.L. - 2/6/2003 8:18:37 PM
  • Re: NASA now claiming debris not enough to cause damage?? - Kim Keller - 2/6/2003 8:47:59 PM
    • Re: NASA now claiming debris not enough to cause damage?? - Davin L. - 2/6/2003 9:57:56 AM
  • 500 mph (n/t) (n/t) - RobVG - 2/6/2003 8:30:59 PM
  • Re: Space debris - Raoul - 2/6/2003 10:31:45 AM
    • A very good point - Tom Brosz - 2/6/2003 2:46:35 PM
    • Re: Space debris - RobVG - 2/6/2003 10:57:05 AM
      • Re: Space debris - Raoul Lannoy - 2/6/2003 6:32:59 PM
        • Re: Space debris - Delbert - 2/7/2003 5:15:19 PM
          • Re: Space debris - SteveS - 2/7/2003 5:41:28 PM
            • ET camera - Delbert - 2/7/2003 6:51:36 PM
  • some #s on the insulation weight & speed of impact - p - 2/6/2003 9:14:05 AM
    • My only question about their analysis... - Larry J - 2/6/2003 9:31:14 AM
      • Re: My only question about their analysis... - Tom Brosz - 2/6/2003 2:43:21 PM
        • Instead of ice water... - Larry J - 2/7/2003 4:05:19 PM
          • Re: Thaw the Chicken - SteveS - 2/7/2003 5:33:15 PM
            • Re: Thaw the Chicken - Larry J - 2/7/2003 5:45:28 PM
              • Re: Your inquiry is what is needed and respected n/t (n/t) - SteveS - 2/7/2003 6:18:15 PM
      • Re: My only question about their analysis... - p - 2/6/2003 9:47:40 AM
        • Which piss-ant New England state? - Larry J - 2/6/2003 9:56:59 AM
          • MA, home of The Bloviators, Kennedy & Kerry n/t (n/t) - p - 2/7/2003 1:39:29 PM
            • You have my sympathy. - Larry J - 2/7/2003 2:43:31 PM