Current Events » in reply to Re: Yes, we do . . .

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Do we have the men and weapons we need? - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2001 6:31:35 PM
  • Re: People keep harping about planning future conflicts based upon the last war . . . - D. Spires - 10/30/2001 8:21:30 PM
    • It's not as hard as that - Larry J - 10/30/2001 8:37:41 PM
      • Re: Yes, that is the easy part . . . - D. Spires - 10/30/2001 11:13:03 AM
  • Depends on how the war will be fought - Larry J - 10/30/2001 6:58:21 PM
    • Re: Depends on how the war will be fought - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2001 7:43:35 PM
      • The best thing to kill a tank is still another tank - Larry J - 10/30/2001 7:57:46 PM
  • Far more efficient intelligence agencies are what's needed, much more than armies (n/t) (n/t) - Raoul - 10/30/2001 6:58:08 PM
    • Re: As well as the ability to keep their traps shut when they learn something . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 10/30/2001 8:10:49 PM
  • Yep - Splinx - 10/30/2001 6:52:31 PM
    • A 100 pound load is reasonable - Larry J - 10/30/2001 7:04:09 PM
  • Re: Yes, we do . . . - D. Spires - 10/30/2001 6:39:01 PM
    • Re: Yes, we do . . . - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2001 6:44:20 PM
      • Re: I was looking at the spelling . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 10/30/2001 8:09:37 PM
    • Brit-speak? What am I missing here? n/t (n/t) - Tony - 10/30/2001 10:02:06 AM
      • Re: Just splitting some hairs, Tony . . . - D. Spires - 10/30/2001 10:59:31 AM
        • On the other hand - wrong........ - Tony - 10/31/2001 3:51:19 PM
          • Re: Then it was a local knut, retyped in Brit-speak . . . - D. Spires - 10/31/2001 3:54:39 PM