Current Events » in reply to It doesn't work that way for Special Ops

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Would Have Sacrificed Troops In ‘91, But Wants a Scoop In ‘01 Terror War . . . - D. Spires - 11/29/2001 4:34:54 PM
  • "Without us..." - Tom Brosz - 11/29/2001 7:43:17 PM
  • The self-absorbed, like Arnett and Sen. Leahy, don't have a clue about what the war is really about. - ebnelson - 11/29/2001 7:13:57 PM
  • A heaping helping of - RNE - 11/29/2001 4:44:47 PM
    • Re: Freudian . . . ? - D. Spires - 11/29/2001 5:11:21 PM
      • Consider me properly chastised Dan ;8^D N/T (n/t) - RNE - 11/29/2001 5:24:14 PM
    • Re: A heaping helping of - alcaray - 11/29/2001 5:07:42 PM
      • Some come home to a hero's welcome - RNE - 11/29/2001 5:40:27 PM
        • We will have to agree to disagree - alcaray - 11/29/2001 11:19:38 AM
          • True, but one final point - RNE - 11/29/2001 11:50:40 AM
            • Re: True, but one final point - alcaray - 11/29/2001 12:08:19 PM
              • Technology has changed everything - Larry J - 11/29/2001 2:15:19 PM
                • Just leave the trench knife out of it... ;) (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/29/2001 3:43:03 PM
              • "There is no reason that the same arrangement could not work now." - Scott - 11/29/2001 2:00:23 PM
      • It doesn't work that way for Special Ops - Larry J - 11/29/2001 5:14:04 PM
        • Sometimes it does - alcaray - 11/29/2001 11:15:07 AM
          • The military seldom trusts the Press - Larry J - 11/29/2001 1:07:40 PM
            • The next time the shooting starts we should load the press in a plane with parachutes - Scott - 11/29/2001 1:52:53 PM