Corporate veil no protection from criminal charges

Current Events » in reply to Thanks for the news on the Anderson suits

FrankC — 1/22/2002 5:55:15 PM (archived)

and huge fines related to those charges. I would expect that Anderson is well insulated from any corporate liability unless this falls under anti-trust laws where there is no corporate veil.

With the way that public sentiments are running who knows what their fate may be. Lynchings happen to the guilty as well as the innocent.

The whole thread (15 posts)

Arthur Anderson's Questionable Practices - Lindy - 1/22/2002 9:21:33 AM
- Time to sue Anderson - E.P. Grondine - 1/22/2002 10:08:41 AM
  - I guess you missed the fact that - ebnelson - 1/22/2002 1:19:19 PM
    - Thanks for the news on the Anderson suits - E.P. Grondine - 1/22/2002 5:59:24 PM
      - criminal prosecution - p - 1/22/2002 7:04:30 PM
        
        mistake - p - 1/22/2002 7:34:07 PM
      - Corporate veil no protection from criminal charges - FrankC - 1/22/2002 5:55:15 PM
        
        I expect accountants to lie, but not auditors - E.P. Grondine - 1/23/2002 9:09:27 AM
        
        The auditors work for the accountants - FrankC - 1/23/2002 6:09:32 PM
        
        They're dead, which should be some satisfaction. - Tom Brosz - 1/23/2002 9:49:11 AM
- Common as Horseflies... - SDAI-Tech1 - 1/22/2002 9:32:12 AM
  - I have wondered about this for awhile: do you have any links? - ebnelson - 1/22/2002 1:16:08 PM
    - Re: I have wondered about this for awhile: do you have any links? - SDAI-Tech1 - 1/22/2002 3:38:33 PM
- Oh, I Forgot to Mention.... - Lindy - 1/22/2002 9:25:21 AM
  - Confusing. They don't make salary. They bill hours. - ebnelson - 1/22/2002 5:47:17 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)