For someone who is trying to "ignore the man," you certainly make it hard on yourself by continually revisiting this same issue.

In any event, your argument was that Enron is getting a lot more ink than Whitewater, and this disparity in coverage is evidence of a liberal bias in the media.

I simply pointed out that President Clinton was found innocent of all charges in the Whitewater affair, while Enron is the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history.

We should expect a disparity in coverage. BB's and black holes. There is no merit to your claim.

Faced with that reality, you try to change the subject with a broadside of distractions, a technique typical of those who find the facts do not support their original statement.

The people who went down in the Whitewater affair are responsible for their own actions, as Clinton was held responsible for his own. It is stretching reality a bit, however, when you imply that the former president should be held accountable for the actions of others.

I didn't read the letter because it is completely irrelevant to the issue which you raised, and I rebutted.

The data you've presented here does not support your hypothesis that the media has a liberal bias.

sp