Tom, your energy is amazing.... Almost as amazing as your ability to oversimplify and convolute language.

Your reply establishes my position for me. Plus you have awarded me points for doing so. I am honored. Realizing your penchant for the quantification of all things, the point award is herein interpreted as a tribute.

If you didn't really mean it as a tribute, then you have provided another illustration of the interpretative nature of reality and the difference between the external reality which our language refers to and the modes of thought employed in understanding that thought.

"Tractus" disproved itself by demonstrating how language can be turned on itself--word games. You know, like you do.

As to my interpretation of the tenents of objectivism, I offer my mea culpas for any substantive error.

I did not say the points were wrong, and I never said you were wrong--just that you oversimplify. You get on good points and then jump off the train to denegrate "psycho liberals" and other vilifications of those that might be in opposition.