>>>You are, therefore, apparently unaware that children are unable to pledge allegiance. This is reserved for adults, who have learned the Pledge. Even in a court of law, a child of 17 will need the oath against perjury explained in detail before taking a stand, and even then the testimony of a minor remains questionable. They are not old enough to pledge. It is a period of learning and growing.
Well it's good to know we won't be throwing them in jail for breaking their pledge!
>>>You keep dredging up that simple waif, where I am discussing children.
Well, yeah. The waif is who I wanted to talk about. I stipulate to anything you want to say about older children voluntarily saying the pledge.
You know, I'm not sure you understood the point I was making. But I said it enough times and ways that I'm not going to keep at it.
Be well!
Current Events » in reply to Re: But now I see where you're coming from . . .
I've pretty much lost interest in this thread, but you deserve a response
