<"I think it would be best all ‘round to just back off and let them kill each other. We could likely keep it contained (through our much-hated, yet incredibly awesome, military might). After the obliteration, we can go in, apologize for their ignorance, and try to piece the region back together -- so they can start it all over again."

Isn't Dan saying they are both wrong? Anyone that thinks Israel is blameless would surely not favor letting them kill each other off. Disagreeing with Fisk and agreeing with Israel on certain points does not mean that one believes that either side is "all good" or "all bad".