<I'd be embarrassed to type some of this stuff, Dan. When you are asked about the implications of your statements, you just deny the statements.
You need to get that reading impairment taken care of, ASAP.
I've fired people for that, and it was easier than firing the folks who stole. They were honestly dishonest.
I've always been honest enough to stand up for what I say and do, little dog -- as well as to post under my own name. Then, I guess you’re only as dishonest as you think you are. I give you your requested definitions, and all you can do is snipe.
Well, you can go on and misquote me all you like, and interpret what I type in whatever context your depraved little brain allows. It’s okay, because I’m finished with you.
“I’m finished with you.”
Hmm-m... I’ve said that a couple times before (a true quote -- from me).
Well, here’s to honesty.
Ciao-chow, and bow-wow,
Dan
Current Events » in reply to Intellectual honesty,
Re: How blissful a life you must lead . . .
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Evil
- Re: Evil
- Re: Evil
- Re: Evil
- Re: Just a bad argument . . .
- Re: Evil
- Re: Evil
