All I said was that I think the rule of law is the preferable way to deal with most non-urgent situations, and that I didn't like the idea of anyone extra-legally running around the world killing at will.
Wouldn't be controversial positions in many places.
By the way, what do you have against laws, anyway? That would be interesting to know.
Does that Christian commandment, "Thou shalt not kill" have a hidden rider, "unless you think you might not like the person, then by all means go ahead"? Of course not. But I'll bet these killers go to church on Sundays, dressed up, piously nodding and kneeling.
Why do you promote killing, in spite of the Christian commandment?
And the response from you - "Bowser doesn't like it when the international community works together -- particularly when there's a Republican in the Oval Office."
I suppose that would fly in a junior high school locker room, might even sound good. Not high school, though. They're a bit more sophisticated.
This Regime doesn't seem to have a philosophy - except to kill. Kill 'em all, period. They don't like the US - kill 'em. We'll teach 'em.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to Re: Careful . . .
Well, the nonsense continues, doesn't it?
The whole thread (19 posts)
- Outstanding! U.S. kills al-Qaida suspect in Yemen
- CIA Strike in Yemen Kills al-Qaeda Leader . . .
- In case anyone hasn't seen it...
- Well, you're right.
- P.S. Haven't heard yet if any of the terrorist masterminds in the car were wearing a wedding dress
- I'm going to drink a beer and toast the spook who was controlling the drone and pulled the triger that fired the missle that killed the lunitics that you have chosen to take sides with
- Re: Tell me you have some concept of the PC world in which most real people reside . . .
- "Never stand next to anyone throwing crap at an armed man" --Larry Niven (n/t) (n/t)
