Re: And there endeth any chance of bipartisanship in the new Senate.(n/t)
<You might have noticed a distinct lack of the concept in the Senate over the past months.
To a Democrat, "bipartisan" means doing what the Democrats want.
Agreed, but of course, you could just have easily written Bush (or Lott) instead of Democrat in there.
I think you need a less divisive leadership in the Senate if you want to get things done now, and build on retaining control in 2004.
Lott (like Gingrich was in the House*) is too much of a polarizer.
Cheers,
Tony
*OK, and Gephardt too, especially in the earlier years.