Facts are so refreshing.

Still waiting, though.

Tell me. What makes you think they have "tough passports"? I know they’re stronger than a single sheet of bond paper, and those were all over the place. You could probably still find them stuck of rooftops. Do you know what condition the booklet in -- considering it was on top of most of the building, and nobody really “knows” whether it came down through a window or through the collapsing structure? Any idea at all?

here 1
This is one of those “any crank, fill in the blanks here” sites:
Anyone, including you, can edit any article right now, without even having to log in.

here 2
The-Movement.com. Another gripping data storehouse -- except here you have data completely controlled by the cranks.

No idea when it was last updated, or how complete the research was that filled the page.

I liked point 5, btw, regarding the “stolen” passports:
German authorities have said this was to cover-up stamps showing trips to Afghanistan which might stop them getting into the US. Presumably this is speculation as they do not have the original passports.

Speculating speculations. They never stop, do they. All you really need to do is find a site where some knut-case says the real authorities are lying, and you have all the proof you need.

here 3
What Really Happened: Stranger Than Fiction - Part 3

The title all by itself is a scam. There is absolutely no concept of physical understanding of the sciences in this article whatsoever, and, of course, it leaps from supposition to supposition as though each were already proven as fact.

It’s merely a sound example of idiocy running rampant.

here 4
Piecing together the shadowy lives of the hijackers

Thank you for posting a real news article. All it mentions for Atta is that he carried two passports, one for the United Arab Emirates, and the other for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The mention of al-Suqami’s passport is an “Excellent New Fact”? I see. Funny that new for you would be dated Sept 20, 2001 -- and with no mention of Atta's passport. Considering the amount of data that slid down that meat-grinder, it seems kinda early in the saga to anchor a fact. Were the two confused and later corrected?

Show me reputable, authoritative updates, not crank high-schooler-sites that gather only the information needed to make them unequivocally right, because that’s is merely slanderous, and outright wrong research.

Kinda like UFO freaks who panted through Peru at Geller’s heels back in the 70s, but failing to speak with the archaeologists working the UFO sites he cited. The real answers were always there, but nobody really wanted to hear them.

You see, when I do a “simple” Google search, sp, it’s usually for real data. I don’t pick the first “simple” answer that crops up and shout VICTORY.

Nice try, but no ceegar,
Dan