I wasn't even going to mention "celebrities"

Current Events » in reply to Re: And then there was Alec Baldwin's open attack on Conan O’Brien's show . . .

I wasn't even going to mention "celebrities"

Larry J — 11/20/2002 10:34:16 AM (archived)

They belong in a category by themselves. I was talking about Democrat politicians and journalists who rail at Republicans with the most outrageous rhetoric. It actually appears some of them are gullible enough to believe their own absurdities.

Media bias? It happens every day. It can range from a crack in movie review (see the last paragraph) to drivel linking conservatism to Fascism to uncritical acceptance of absurdities from the academic community like this one.

Andrew Sullivan wrote a good article on media bias for the Sunday Times of London. Bias is inescapable, so why don't they just be honest and admit it?

The whole thread (25 posts)

Any links to Daschle's latest temper tantrum? - ebnelson - 11/20/2002 9:29:06 AM
- Speak of the debbil - ebnelson - 11/20/2002 9:31:10 AM
  - Do you suppose he might have a point about death threats to his family? - alcaray - 11/21/2002 4:22:52 PM
    - Not according to Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post - Larry J - 11/21/2002 5:37:06 PM
    - Re: Of course not . . . - D. Spires - 11/21/2002 5:28:58 PM
    - Re: Do you suppose he might have a point - Tom Brosz - 11/21/2002 5:11:50 PM
      - Well, I have listened to Rush - alcaray - 11/21/2002 7:21:25 PM
        
        Whoops...a slip of the fingers. - Tom Brosz - 11/21/2002 8:58:19 PM
        
        Democrat rhetoric is geared toward fear - Larry J - 11/21/2002 8:22:27 PM
        
        And Republican rhetoric is different because....? - Tony - 11/21/2002 9:46:04 AM
        
        Ok, one by one - Larry J - 11/21/2002 10:55:21 AM
        
        Predictable and proved my point, but thanks anyway n/t (n/t) - Tony - 11/22/2002 5:35:05 PM
        
        If you can't refute the truth... - Larry J - 11/22/2002 9:58:13 AM
        
        Thanks...saved me the trouble of pointing it out. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/21/2002 11:25:25 AM
        
        Bless you, man. We hear the list so frequently here, I've given up calling them on it. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 11/21/2002 10:05:10 AM
  - Re: That was -- 'entertaining' . . . ;^) (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 11/20/2002 9:38:35 AM
  - Dashelle has lost it. Again. - Scott - 11/20/2002 9:38:13 AM
  - Funny how he never complained of the "very shrill edge" in political discussion... - Larry J - 11/20/2002 9:38:05 AM
    - You're an idiot if you listen to Limbaugh - Scott - 11/20/2002 10:15:17 AM
      - Yes - Tony - 11/20/2002 12:13:56 PM
      - Ideas - Tom Brosz - 11/20/2002 11:13:27 AM
      - Daschle will fail utterly. He has the reasoning ability and integrity of Bowser - ebnelson - 11/20/2002 10:41:05 AM
    - Re: And then there was Alec Baldwin's open attack on Conan O’Brien's show . . . - D. Spires - 11/20/2002 10:04:06 AM
      - I wasn't even going to mention "celebrities" - Larry J - 11/20/2002 10:34:16 AM
        
        Re: I don't generally have a problem with people sounding off as Baldwin did . . . - D. Spires - 11/20/2002 10:58:57 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (25 posts)