From the Rightist Twilight Zone...
That was a bit ironic, Tom: That vote is listed there because PAW obviously considers Thomas's politics more important than his race. They consider Thomas's ideology to be anti-civil rights, and a "yes" vote to confirm him to therefore be anti-civil rights. You are the one putting race first, while you accuse them of racism. Who's focusing solely on skin color?
And a good morning to you too. It's gonna be a windy and wet day here in the Bay Area. Batten down the hatches!
--Robert
