Re: The UN is becoming a historic farse
According to this article (the first one I happened to come across), the Security Council voted unanimously to accept the darft resolution 1464. As the US is a permanant member of the SC, it apparently voted for it.
Regarding Libya and Iraq, as you mentioned: If one does not agree with another's policies or ideas, does that mean that the other has no right to participate? It seems to me that Iraq has the most at stake regarding disarmament, does that not make it an ideal location for such a conference? (other than the fact that the site may be blown to bits by cruise missiles, of course)