I don't just draw from newspapers. I research across the spectrum from the mass news media to scientific journals and a host of others. For example, when I come across some website breathlessly talking about some sinister plot posed by jet contrails, I can check on organic chemistry sources with emphasis on combustion byproducts along with aeronautical engineering sources. It doesn't take long to see how foolish the "contrails conspiracy" websites really are. That's but one example of the easily refuted and plain silly conspiracies you've posted here.

Obviously YOUR sources are from newspapers that print only certain truths, and ignore or gloss over other important truths. There are many places to glean information from, and one has to look everywhere and then match up the information.

Ah, but that's the comedy of it all. You and the other conspiracy wonks believe that the truth is being hidden by all of the mass media, the government, academia, and the military, but somehow YOU'RE DISCOVERED THE TRUTHS! Not just the TRUTHS, BUT IMPORTANT TRUTHS! What a joke.

I never take any source at face value. I cross check it from multiple sources, and credibility counts for everything. Credibility is something that once lost, it can't be regained. You lost your credibility a long, long time ago. I consider the fact that you think I've lost my credibility because I don't believe your silly sources as a compliment. If YOU considered me credible, then I'd be worried.