It shouldn't be too long before they isolate some antibodies from someone who has survived and recovered from SARS and attempt to make a toxoid cocktail that could do some good.

The mutation rate is of course the major problem. I'd be curious as to the blood types of the ones who succumb versus the ones who had survived it. There might be something there one could use to see how best to defeat it.

I wonder if it has a genotype preference or if any particular genotype has greater success in fighting it. All these should factors should be put to work in fighting the disease.

Viral pneumonia will someday be treated by energies deadly to the virus. I know the dry air out here is claimed as a health benefit - but I seriously wonder if it may also have something to do with the 20% greater intensity sunlight as well. The residents here receive a higher ray count as well as rays of higher frequency. Of course, this causes a much higher incidence of skin cancer for those who are not careful or those particularly who have less melanin producing cells to convert that wave energy coherently. It may also play a role in treating infectious disease.

The old sunlamp treatment for those in colder climates was a primitive start. Each virus has to have a fundamental frequency. This frequency when matched should be able to create a cancellation process. Like the tuning fork shattering the glass. In theory an electromagnetic field tuned to the virus' fundamental frequency should kill them when put in the proximity of the field.
The mutation in pathogens is really a change in the fundamental frequency.

Such a cure would, in theory, create an almost instantaneous cure and should be harmless to all tissues.

Immunization does approximately the same thing - it creates blood cells which have recorded the fundamental frequency of a given toxin. As they encounter the toxoid they record it as a set of wave form signals and pass this data on to other cells. These cells are now immune to infection because they have a waveform which cancels out that of the signal of the pathogen.

By eventually learning these frequencies and perfecting a process of treating cells with them, while making adjustments for mutation, we will have an entirely new and effective tool in which to fight disease.

Imagine a day when a 75 year old with viral pneumonia could enter a booth and be completely cured after a fifteen minute treatment!

Yes, we are a long way from measuring these signals and frequencies and instead must rely on chemical and other reactions we can observe. But there is hope that when the nanorevolution really takes off we will see these type of devices wipe out the presently incurable diseases such as AIDs, etc.

In the meanwhile, a positive consciousness will do wonders in countering all diseases, as one's cells operate at peak efficiency and more effectively create antobodies to pathogens, etc.

SDAI-Tech1