"You are still failing to understand why we invaded Iraq. It's because Saddam refused comply with '91 cease fire agreement. Saddam was suppose to declare all WMD, then inspectors were suppose to verify that it was an accurate declaration, destroy these weapons, then monitor any remaining WMD capability (assuming it was dual use type)"
But if we find no WMD, it implies he was in compliance with at least THAT part of the cease fire agreement (Which by the way, have you EVER EVEN READ!?!?!)
You are playing after-the-fact with your arguments that this war was fought due to the tyranny of Saddam. Our ONLY expressed justification before day one of this war was self-defense. So this really puts a lie to your whole argument in general.
Davin
Current Events » in reply to Re: Iraqi WMD's : Still no smoking gun
Re: Iraqi WMD's : Still no smoking gun
