Your 1st two links seem to establish that the organization was a terrorist organization, but most of the alledged terrorist activities took place long ago. (Like 1979)

And there is no allegation that the US or British intellegence were supporting this group at that time.

The 3rd link infact makes a point to the contrary by stating that the British intellegence actually installed the Shiite Ayatollahs in Iran! Just think...Thse sneaky Brits caused the Iran Hostage crisis of 1979...(Gee that doesn't call into question this sources reliability)...But you are correct: It does give a 1 line to Senator Helms...(I guess british intellegence didn't let him in on the secret concerning which side we REALLY Support in Iran)

The 4th Link, well it refers to Congress in 1998 when relations with Iran were much more confrontational then they are now... And I am still not seeing anything that links the Bush Administration (2000-2008) with events in the congress in 1998.

the 5th link once again refers to events of 1979-1981 when making the terrorism connection...

By these standards we defenitly shouldn't have any relationship with Hammas or the PLO...Afterall, they too are now, or have been in the past on the State Department's list of terrorist Organisations.

So Just what the hell is the coherent p[oint of all these links?

They support nothing. Your original claim that the Bush Administration is in bed with a pro-communist terrorist organization has been proven to be completely bogus.

come on. present a real issue will you?

Scott