And this time, scroll down the Google page a few lines, to Numbers Four and Five on a hit parade of 113,000...
ABC News reprinting an analysis from Stratfor.com (remember when Dan used to post Stratfor almost daily? I, for one, miss that).
This may be even nearer the mark: US Committee for a Free Lebanon - not exactly a "Jewish reference," is it...
See if you can find ANY other modern references to "occupied" territories in political references other than those "occupied" by Israel or the U.S.
You asked, you got. Wasn't good enough? Maybe I'll be back tomorrow with occupations of other countries. Lebanon was so easy you could have done it typing one-handed - you're very good at this sort of thing, Tom, except whenever checking your own accuracy might spoil your preconception.
Current Events » in reply to Okay, I guess I should have expected Jewish references to use the term. (n/t)
Try again
The whole thread (34 posts)
- U.S. weapons search team quits - no banned weapons found
- Meanwhile on the front page of MSNBC
- Commentary
- Re: Commentary
- Re: Commentary
- Re: Commentary
- Re: Commentary
- And then there's this
- Re: Commentary
- Re:The US doens't have the European experience of having been invaded
- We were the invaders, here. n/t (n/t)
- Re: The US doens't have the European experience of having been invaded
- Not with the same frequency or result, true
- Re:The US doens't have the European experience of having been invaded
- Since the French were actively assisting Saddam
