Tome wrote:
"6. Apparently Scheer thinks the Middle East and the world in general would be a better place if Saddam and his sons ruled Iraq for the next forty years."

And he says this where? Or is this just a reductio ad hominem again... Or is it that anyone who disagreess with this war was pro-saddam... Yer either Wit us or Agin us?

Tom wrote:
"7. If he doesn't agree with #6, then what?"

If he doesn't agree with #6, I think best reason concludes he doesn't agree with #6. Just because I think the wall I'm looking at right now as I write this is not-white doesn't mean you get to arbitrarily pick a color for me.

False Dichotomies *might* work with children and the lame-of-mind, Tom- but not us average minded grownups ;-)

Tom wrote:
"Frankly, Scheer doesn't give a rat's ass about Iraq, Saddam, North Korea, or anything else other than trying to find a weak point to wreck Bush and the Republicans."

Kudos to him, as since the Bush administration lied, mislead and lied again... Landed us in a war, killed a few thousand people and charged up a few tens of billions in prosecuting said war... that administration SHOULD be taken down and whipped through the streets of every american town in a public spectacle.

Oh, well, it would be *different* if they lied about an act of consensual sex in which nobody died and cost WELL under 40billion...

But you still don't care- do You?

Davin L.