"Excuse me how were we supposed to have posession of his weapons before the war?"
Huh? No, we/you were not talking about possession, we were talking about proof. You can, of course, have proof without possession- or are most proved truths going to be thrown out the window because they are about things that fundamentally can not be possessed?

"Off course we went to war on the basis of belief. "
Which to me sounds like the point I was trying to make... How does this make us any more morally correct than the Islamists who war with us on the basis of belief?

"Does your circular logic ever make you dizzy? "
An old addage: the pot calling the kettle black...