I wasn't referring to your response to Jody.
I'm not going to debate you point for point because it would be pointless. You will never deviate from your concrete notions of a conservative.
But I will say conservatives do everything they can to support themselves without assistance. They feel that everyone should do everything possible to do the same.
They also realize that not everyone is created equal in intelligence, drive, and physical capabilities. All but the most unimaginable Ebenezers among the persuasion would not see the need to extend a helping hand where it‘s needed.
Conservatives believe that the family unit should be the safety net- again maintaining personal responsibility within the family.
Liberals believe that the government is the family of the nation. Progressive ideas lead to the minimalization of the patriarch. Today the man can be replaced without effort by alimony and child support and is easily substituted by any walking dildo with a wallet. The substitution often pales in comparison to what can be achieved by real people in committed relationships. The shortfalls must be made up for by the ‘national family‘.
I’m proud to be a fiscal conservative and will never apologize for it. And I don’t take kindly to your vitriolic rants. As old and wise as you think you are, I‘d have thought you would have learned a thing or two about judgment and tolerance.
Hate on Bowser, hate on…..
Flame » in reply to Well, without the context you'd be absolutely correct.
You're over the top in your hatred. It's disproportionate to say the least.
The whole thread (23 posts)
- "Compassion that doesn’t cost someone a penny is what proxy “compassion” is."
- Re: "Compassion that doesn’t cost someone a penny is what proxy “compassion” is."
- Re: "Compassion that doesn’t cost someone a penny is what proxy “compassion” is."
- Now you're just being silly.
- I don't get excited very often, maybe 5 or 6 times a day.
- Read TBs post, and say I'm being silly. Read the post and tell me I've misinterpreted him!!!
- A "transfer of value" can mean giving of oneself.
- Bowser is either suppressing the point or honestly doesn't get it.
- Re: Bowser is either suppressing the point or honestly doesn't get it.
- The reason you have to be forced at gunpoint is because you would never share.
- Bowser is either suppressing the point or honestly doesn't get it.
- A "transfer of value" can mean giving of oneself.
