At least, I don't think you are. WMD was one of 3 reasons Bush gave for deposing Saddam. The other two were support for terrorism (and that has been proven by documents seized from the Iraqi intelligence agencies) and his brutal rule of Iraq (which has been proven by many mass graves, torture chambers, etc.). Iraq is still a country the size of California. There are still a lot of places that have not been inspected. I still believe evidence of WMD (beyond those 2 or 3 trailers) will be found. Following the 1991 Gulf War, it took UN inspectors months and in some cases years to find out about Saddams WMD programs. You're expecting instant results in a matter of weeks while at the same time noting that things aren't exactly peaceful and under control at the moment. Saddam had WMD in the 1980s and used them. The UN inspection programs found that he had active programs in the 1990s. It seems unlikely that he suddenly ended all such programs after kicking out the inspectors and destroyed all evidence of their existance.

As for Clinton, his stupidity brought all the trouble upon himself. He did far more than simply lie about a blow job. He did it under oath giving testimony on a sexual harassment lawsuit (which the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that he had to do). If you can't see the difference between a simple lie and lying under oath, then I'll have to reassess what I said in the subject line.