Hum, let see...I posted a actively linked qoute from Webb that clearly shows his concern was protecting Apollo that started at the beginning of Apollo.
There where serious Apollo Hardware missions designs after 1965. I only posted one (with an active link, btw). There have been serious designs studies from Russia and NASA since then with either using Soyuz Hardware or Shuttle Hardware or needing a new launch system...
What is your point?
All I get from you is your misunderstanding of how NASA works. HQ would have had to voice support for the mission to have it become the next agenda and Webb was interested in finishing Apollo.
I get the feeling you're trying to say that something that happened 45 years is still the key factor to current NASA agenda. Clueless or in some kind of fanasy world?
--Chris Vancil
Space/Science » in reply to re: re: The public does not want to waste its money sending men to Mars, and no convention will change that
re: re: re: The public does not want to waste its money
The whole thread (22 posts)
- TMSC 6 and Abstract Deadline...
- The public does not want to waste its money sending men to Mars, and no convention will change that
- re: The public does not want to waste its money sending men to Mars, and no convention will change that
- Maybe you should invite EP and Barry as contrarian not-so-key-note speakers
- Maybe Leno will send a "correspondent"
- re: Maybe you should invite EP and Barry as contrarian not-so-key-note speakers
- re: Barry has! I don't know about Mr. EP Groaning...8-) (n/t)
- The public does not want to waste its money sending men to Mars, and no convention will change that