But the current flap about the uranium in Niger is like making a big deal about Al Capone being wrongly accused of a moving violation.
In the Old Days, (for instance, while RFK was Attroney General) one of the standard methods of busting organized crime figures was a Federal indictment for tax evasion - small potatoes compared to murder, prostitution, extortion and drug traffic, but... see the title of this post. I think we all understand that the inclusion of "that line" in the S.o.t.U. speech has the relative appearance of a moving violation... what remains to be ferreted out is: Is the accusation false?, and Was that all?
We are talking about a bigger picture here, and a lot more information.
We certainly are.
Off Topic » in reply to re: If all intelligence is guesswork, how can any of it be called reliable?
You get 'em however you can
The whole thread (25 posts)
- "Your opinion" on CNN
- CNN is the last to talk about credibility
- re:The audience
- A) It was a joke
- You don't know a damned thing about how Intel works, do you?
- I do I do teacher Larry! See, they take this wafer of silicon and they....
- " Intel" versus Bush's Hearts' Desire
- It wasn't just any speech.
- Please read the linked article
- "Conjectural Inference Agency" ;-) (n/t)
- You don't know a damned thing about how Intel works, do you?
- CNN is the last to talk about credibility
