[Let me tell you what I know. When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N. and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not just continued sanctions.]
- Pres. Bill Clinton
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/22/lkl.00.html
Current Events » in reply to You are refering to the Clinton White House aren't you?
re: You are refering to the Clinton White House aren't you?
The whole thread (22 posts)
- Why it might be harder than you think to find WMD in Iraq
- Because they don't exist
- re: Why are nuke weapons program papers being found buried in scientist's backyard with instructions to 'reincorporate them' once UN sanctions were finally lifted . . . ?
- You are refering to the Clinton White House aren't you?
- Clinton on nuclear weapons in Iraq
- re: You are refering to the Clinton White House aren't you?
- NEWSFLASH!
- re: NEWSFLASH!
- Lame ducking?
- P.S.
- re: Lame ducking?
- Tom Brosz Patented 'Proof by endless and ad nauseum iteration' (aka Linguistic self-stimulation)
- Lame ducking?
- re: 'It is nice to see ol' Bill being quoted in a positive light for once . . .'
- re: NEWSFLASH!
- NEWSFLASH!
- Because they don't exist
