tom wrote: "major combat operations started on March 21st, and ended on May 1st. I don't know where the hell this FIVE MONTHS keeps coming from. It has been about four months since the war even started, and less than three since we were able to start looking for evidence in any meaningful way"
Yes, we are in the Fifth month of the war. Lets count them.
March-21 to April-21st
April-21st to May-21st
May-21st to June-21st
June-21st to July-21st
July-21st to August 21st.
We are in the fifth month of the war by my reconing. And if you don't think we had teams looking for WMD on day one of the operation, I have a bridge to sell you.
Everything else- we have been through before. Like I said, its just linguistic masturbation until significant amount of WMD, and even just a few Saddam-linked terrorists show up.
Put up, or shut up. ;-)
God, I am going to love watching you insist the sky is purple with green stripes in month 12. I mean, I'm going to just love it.
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to Let's see if I got this right...
Right more than you usually are ;-)
The whole thread (22 posts)
- Why it might be harder than you think to find WMD in Iraq
- Because they don't exist
- re: Why are nuke weapons program papers being found buried in scientist's backyard with instructions to 'reincorporate them' once UN sanctions were finally lifted . . . ?
- You are refering to the Clinton White House aren't you?
- Clinton on nuclear weapons in Iraq
- re: You are refering to the Clinton White House aren't you?
- NEWSFLASH!
- re: NEWSFLASH!
- Lame ducking?
- P.S.
- re: Lame ducking?
- Tom Brosz Patented 'Proof by endless and ad nauseum iteration' (aka Linguistic self-stimulation)
- Lame ducking?
- re: 'It is nice to see ol' Bill being quoted in a positive light for once . . .'
- re: NEWSFLASH!
- NEWSFLASH!
- Because they don't exist
