You seem to be some kind of engineer. You have 3 part sof an argument. The first is the axioms or assumptions that you start with. The next part is whether you use logic correctly. The third part is whether people agree with your conclusion. If they don't then they may be either wrong or you can be. Then you check you logic to see if there are any logical fallacies. If not then you need to check your assumptions.
The problem is the assumptions you argure from are nonsense and so logic always gives you the wrong answer. Since you seem incapable of questioning your initial assumptions you seem to end up in a dead end wondering why everyone doesn't believe like you do. In fact the real problem is your assumptions have as much chance of working as the moon is of being made of cheese.
No developed country in the whole world would follow the economics you push because they know it is a load of nonsense and would damage their economies. Not a single one believes that unmanaged capitalism works, and they are all quite prosperous. To change anyone's mind you have to prove your assumptions are correct but you can't do that because they are nonsense. You then seem to be reduced to mouthing the same unprovable statements over and over and wondering why people don't "get it".

"Do you honestly think most tax money flows to the rich? That wealth is static? That the wealth of the rich is taken out of the economic system? Are you familiar with the concept of capital at all?" This is part of your nonsensical assumptions. Unless you are capable of looking critically at things like this you will never understand modern economics. No resposible economists in the world who are running things (except for the madness off the current Republican party) would believe this tripe. Funny how no one else in the world seems to be having problems but the Republicans.