From previous post:
J:"I could respond by saying that; mass at rest, containing energy, is an oxymoron. Or I could say that perhaps you lack the oxy and are total m…….. But that would only confuse the issue at hand. "
R.L.: NO it is not an oxymoron! That is the whole point! If you have an antiproton at rest and it annihilates with a proton at rest you get energy, and the amount of the energy is related to the original mass by Einstein's equation. You understand less than nothing on this subject...

OK :I will make a *serious* attempt at understanding what your are saying.
OK : An antiproton at rest. I can understand that, it is not moving in relation to any other object in the universe or its own structure. Lets imagine that it would be possible. Now then, we also have a proton under similar constraints. How far away is that proton from the antiproton that is resting?
OK : perhaps we do not know, so lets take a guess. Say that the particles are one nanometer away from each other. Now my question is: How do they *get together* or annihilate each other if they do not move?
I do not know the answer that question, perhaps you do: Well; what the heck, lets ignore the linear motion of one of the entities. Lets suppose that the proton is approaching the antiproton that is at rest, at what point do they start to annihilate each other and how and why does that annihilation process occur, also why does the resulting 'energy' have the ability to do work? In other words, what is *energy* and how is it generated by proton antiproton combination.

I have a model or a theory that explains these types of phenomenon and many other wonders of nature.

Now R.L. IF you were able to give correct answers to the above questions at the age of 12 then I must kneel in front of you and ask your forgiveness for debating with you. Do you have any proof of your claim?

You are clearly wrong on this, experiment and theory blow you out of the water, end of game. You can say what you want it will NOT change the fact that you are hopelessly wrong... You claim you have studied this for 40 years- I knew enough to see your claims are full of holes when I was 12!
Snip

R.L.: No I am talking about special and general relativity, If you weren't a complete numbskull on the subject you would know that!

That is interesting, because I too am talking about the same subject. Why is it that we can not understand each other?
I thought that I started by asking you what the word energy means in your understanding. I thought that I also said or at least implied somewhere that the mathematical formula that I have created, improves the understanding of mass, energy, and the constant, used in Einstein's formula.

How could I improve my communication skill, so that you would grasp the meaning of what I am trying to convey.

I'll address the rest of your drivel later- I have _real_ science to do tonight...
Good luck
Keep smiling
Johannes