Space/Science » in reply to re: "Scientific" Theory for Vancil

The whole thread (41 posts)

• Vanished super-ocean or expanding Earth? - BD - 10/10/2003 7:34:59 PM
  • how do Santa's reigndeer fly, and will this mass acretion effect their performance characteristics? N/t (n/t) - Scott Evil - 10/13/2003 10:54:55 PM
  • Geez, I can't believe we're actually discussing this concept. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/13/2003 4:48:44 AM
    • Barry just likes to remove all doubt about his scientific incompetance from time to time to the joy of many others. (n/t) - Buster - 10/13/2003 1:35:34 PM
      • re: The "Coward" Big Buster just likes to remove all doubt about his scientific incompetance from time to time to the joy of many others. - BD - 10/13/2003 8:17:49 PM
        • BD the chicken parrot - Buster Didipshit - 10/13/2003 8:51:31 PM
  • Expanding Earth - the scientific analysis - Nick Hoffman - 10/12/2003 4:54:51 AM
    • No worry: New Mars synthesis should occur next year - E.P. Grondine - 10/13/2003 9:44:40 PM
    • I still think Lamarck was on to something. - Lee - 10/13/2003 2:39:36 AM
      • I still think we should do a better job teaching evolution in public schools (n/t) - Buster - 10/13/2003 1:36:50 PM
    • Nice Summary Nick. Thanks - Mark Eby - 10/12/2003 4:44:59 PM
  • If the earth is expanding, then I am sure it is Pres. Bush's fault - ebnelson - 10/12/2003 1:59:55 AM
    • Bush and the Aliens... - Nick Hoffman - 10/12/2003 4:58:34 AM
  • Feeling Warm & Fuzzy Over Another Anti-establishment "Scientific" Theory - Mark Eby - 10/11/2003 2:09:10 AM
    • re: "Scientific" Theory - BD - 10/11/2003 12:42:40 PM
      • If by 'scientific theory' you mean 'totally useless conjecture devoid of evidence' - ebnelson - 10/13/2003 12:55:28 PM
      • re: "Scientific" Theory - Chris Vancil - 10/12/2003 12:11:57 AM
        • re: "Scientific" Theory for Vancil - BD - 10/12/2003 1:10:01 AM
          • You don't seem very ethical on this, BD (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/13/2003 1:01:56 PM
          • re: "Scientific" Theory for Vancil? - Chris Vancil - 10/12/2003 7:16:59 AM
          • You're Kidding Right? - Mark Eby - 10/12/2003 3:52:00 AM
      • Doesn't really have to be "disproven." - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2003 4:24:39 PM
        • re: Doesn't really have to be "disproven." - Johannes - 10/12/2003 12:51:31 AM
        • re: Doesn't really have to be "disproven." The scientific method says it does...here is the abstract - BD - 10/12/2003 12:48:56 AM
          • Science Requires Proof To Accept Theories Not Disproof Of Every Contrary Theory - Mark Eby - 10/12/2003 4:33:12 PM
      • Your Scientific Ignorance Is Showing Again - Mark Eby - 10/11/2003 4:04:30 PM
        • re: Your Scientific Ignorance Is Showing Again Eby..peer review process 101 - BD - 10/12/2003 12:57:34 AM
          • Go Back And Read My Original Question - Mark Eby - 10/12/2003 3:46:29 AM
  • re: Expanding Earth - Tom Brosz - 10/10/2003 8:40:52 PM
    • re: Expanding Earth - Adam - 10/10/2003 10:34:57 PM
      • Carey is dead... - Nick Hoffman - 10/11/2003 3:27:26 PM
        • re: true sailing is dead... - BD - 10/12/2003 12:59:32 AM
        • The corpse has some ardent defenders... - Adam - 10/11/2003 10:04:44 PM
          • re: If the density decreases then the volume increases. (n/t) - Johannes - 10/12/2003 1:16:14 AM
            • re: Density doesn't just decrease. In materials engineering you add something lighter to a mix to make it less dense... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/12/2003 6:38:23 AM
              • re: re Physics vs. engineering - Johannes - 10/12/2003 7:11:19 PM
                • Please do some numbers on this. - Tom Brosz - 10/13/2003 4:45:59 AM
                  • re: some numbers . - Johannes - 10/14/2003 1:37:28 AM
                    • re: some numbers . - R.L. - 10/15/2003 8:01:22 PM
                • Space is ALREADY a vacuum - Nick Hoffman - 10/12/2003 11:00:23 PM
                  • re:ALREADY a vacuum - Johannes - 10/16/2003 1:37:30 AM