Go Back And Read My Original Question
I did not dismiss this article out of hand. I asked why you favored these types of articles. My subsequent comments were directed at you and your comments not the author of the article you sited other than to express my general attitude of skepticism towards their position. They are taking the proper scientific approach by publishing in a peer reviewed journal. The article was most likely published because it contained data of importance not because the conclusions were considered valid. As I said before real science must attempt address all the data unlike your book which ignored much of the Viking data by your own admission.
Regards,
Mark