He's a politician, Raoul. I doubt that, unless directly asked about it, he'll be repeating this if nominated for the real run.
Dean has said nothing of technological splendor that could impress me to his number. gore succeeded in 2000 by being the only candidate to give a halfway intelligent responce to a question on nanotech, let alone the only one I heard who even mentioned it. He won my vote, but lost the election.
Bush has still not said a damned thing of technological splendor either (small wonder), but then he has impressed me in other ways since.
Besides, we're still a little busy decoying terrorists away from our allies in Europe. Well, someone’s gotta do it and, as usual, the world remains a U.S.-led affair.
>sigh<
Dan (wondering if the mothers of EU soldiers' appreciate our sacrifices at all)
Space/Science » in reply to Dean on Mars
re: Dean on Mars? I wish . . .
The whole thread (27 posts)
- Dean on Mars
- re: Dean on Mars? I wish . . .
- re: Dean on Mars? I wish . . .
- depends...
- Raoul, with all respect you are completely wrong.
- re: Dean & Mars do not compile a decent topic to begin with . . .
- re: Dean on Mars? I wish . . .
- Frustrating search!
- Yeah, right after the budget is balanced...
- re: Dean on Mars? I wish . . .
