Space/Science » in reply to re: link to Science abstract

The whole thread (17 posts)

• Death Nell For Levin's Bad Science - Buster - 11/10/2003 4:57:55 PM
  • All she wrote - Donald - 11/11/2003 2:16:01 AM
  • "That's not Nell - it's my horse, in a Nell suit!" - D. Dooright - 11/10/2003 6:42:47 PM
  • link to Science abstract - Buster - 11/10/2003 6:08:05 PM
    • re: link to Science abstract - Robert Clark - 11/11/2003 11:15:05 PM
    • re: link to Science abstract - et - 11/10/2003 8:45:05 PM
      • Ah, so the mystery "oxidant" remains a mystery... - Robert Clark - 11/11/2003 5:43:04 AM
        • This time you are ignoring or misunderstanding the data - Buster - 11/11/2003 12:36:30 PM
          • No, I'm following their data. - Robert Clark - 11/11/2003 2:44:36 PM
            • re: No, I'm following their data. - Robert Clark - 11/11/2003 3:23:20 PM
              • No because I'm familiar with chemical analysis unlike you - Buster - 11/11/2003 4:20:48 PM
              • re: No, I'm following their data. - Greg - 11/11/2003 3:54:30 PM
      • re: link to Science abstract - JonClarke - 11/10/2003 9:57:19 PM
        • it is always bad science to ignore contrary evidence and/or the balance of the data - Buster - 11/11/2003 12:42:59 PM
          • re: it is always bad science to ignore contrary evidence and/or the balance of the data - JonClarke - 11/11/2003 10:07:50 PM
          • "It is always bad science to ignore contrary evidence and/or the balance of the data." I agree completely! - Robert Clark - 11/11/2003 3:19:07 PM
            • re: "It is always bad science to ignore contrary evidence and/or the balance of the data." I agree completely! - Buster - 11/11/2003 4:14:51 PM