Pretty specific, in context, and in the public record.
You've claimed there are hundreds or thousands of possible warnings and scenarios over that time. Please provide a few examples that you think would prevent the Air Force from fulfilling its primary mission, or which would prevent the national security advisor from being aware (she says) of this threat.
At any rate, the issue here, to repeat, is the commission's access to presidential briefings, which are classified. We've already seen that "...the intelligence community had produced various reports over the years suggesting that terrorists might use airplanes as weapons." The commission members might be looking for the smoking gun which would prove that the Bush administration had specific, classified warnings of the very scenario which unfolded on 9-11-2001.
It's not enough, apparently, that anybody with a lick of common sense should have recognized the danger.
S
Current Events » in reply to They are a few out of hundreds or thousands of possible warnings and scenarios over that time.
"Suicide bomber(s)...could crash-land an aircraft...into the Pentagon, the CIA, or the White House."
The whole thread (21 posts)
- Deal on 9/11 Briefings Lets White House Edit Papers
- What part of "highly classified" is giving you trouble?
- What part?
- Why am I not surprised?
- What part of "highly classified" is giving you trouble?
