...its about the just released findings of President Bush's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. The report concludes that U.S. intelligence services relied upon inaccurate information and failed to confirm sources. On the basis of this, the report asserts that the President did not deliberately lie, but made his comments on the basis of bad intelligence.

Frankly, if I didn't post the unpleasant news stories here, this BBS would be all pro-Bush all the time. Instead of chastising the messenger, why not just read the stories, process the information they contain and then arrive at your own conclusions? That's what I do. I don't run around complaining that all Ed and Tom do is post pro-Bush stuff. I read what they post and discuss its merits and demerits.

Now if you actually read the article I linked to here in this thread you'd see it contained both positive and negative content regarding Mr. Bush. On the positive side it asserts that he did not deliberately lie. On the negative side it concludes that he based his policy on IRaq on failed intelligence. You take it from there.