Space/Science » in reply to "New Jamestown" first permanent colony on Mars

The whole thread (23 posts)

• "New Jamestown" first permanent colony on Mars - William Anderson - 1/20/2004 12:56:25 AM
  • It would take a religous movement. Like the quakers, a religous sect on Earth would be seeking a new place for just "them" - Scott Evil - 1/20/2004 8:04:00 PM
    • That is the future of space travel. - Lee - 1/21/2004 7:56:26 AM
    • Yes The Religion Is Called Mathematics - Mark Eby - 1/20/2004 11:51:14 PM
  • The problem is simple: The equipment and supplies required for a permanent colony would dwarf the requirements for a return trip. - David F Mayer - 1/20/2004 2:59:56 PM
    • That is the Catch-22 - Tom Brosz - 1/20/2004 8:29:39 PM
    • A way to make it a bit easier. - Lee - 1/20/2004 7:58:47 PM
      • Try working backwards. Figure out what the minimum self-sustaining Mars colony would be like, and work from there to what it would require. - David F Mayer - 1/20/2004 9:14:39 PM
        • minimum NON-self-sustaining Mars outpost - Nick Hoffman - 1/21/2004 5:17:14 AM
        • Nice Analysis But - Mark Eby - 1/21/2004 12:00:43 AM
      • Wrong URL - Lee - 1/20/2004 8:00:46 PM
  • Jamestown or Roanoke? - Lee - 1/20/2004 5:58:44 AM
    • re: Jamestown or Roanoke? - R.L. - 1/20/2004 6:35:59 AM
      • You thought of that too. - Lee - 1/20/2004 6:51:47 AM
  • Just a couple of things - FrankC - 1/20/2004 1:48:18 AM
    • What's wrong with 1/6th G? - Jacob Samorodin - 1/20/2004 2:22:33 PM
      • Sorry Jacob - FrankC - 1/21/2004 1:58:39 AM
      • Can I take your silence, Frank, to mean agreement? (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 1/20/2004 8:36:58 PM
    • Comments - Nick Hoffman - 1/20/2004 3:40:16 AM
      • mice - FrankC - 1/20/2004 4:55:42 AM
        • Of Mice and Men - Nick Hoffman - 1/20/2004 8:16:32 AM
          • New Links On Mars Gravity Biosatellite Program - Mark Eby - 1/20/2004 11:47:25 PM
        • re: mice - SteveS - 1/20/2004 5:24:26 AM