re: An end to skepticism

Flame » in reply to An end to skepticism

re: An end to skepticism

Johannes — 1/24/2004 4:23:37 AM (archived)

When it is more than ufoologist bullshit. Ed

Thank you for the answer Ed, the answer is appreciated, although I did not get the amount of information that would have satisfied my curiosity.

Would you please narrow down your definition by stating what a "ufoologist" must do or show to you in order to convince you that he/she is "right" about the subject matter.
(Assuming of course that they have "scientific" information or "working models" etc.)

Would the "scientific information" be enough? Or would a "working model" convince you? Or would it need to be a full size working "ship" that would convince you.

Johannes

The whole thread (40 posts)

UFO caught by city worker. - Nick - 1/23/2004 11:44:10 PM
- Looks like an out-of focus bird in the foreground. - Scott Evil - 1/27/2004 6:58:53 PM
- im moving this to the flameboard(trash can) tomorrow - Justin Kelly - 1/24/2004 5:48:37 AM
  - This should have been on Off Topic....... - Lindy - 1/24/2004 7:45:58 AM
    - re: This should have been on Off Topic.......I agree (n/t) - Johannes - 1/24/2004 4:47:08 PM
    - re: I agree . . . - D. Spires - 1/24/2004 8:50:33 AM
  - Good call (n/t) - ebnelson - 1/24/2004 5:54:17 AM
- Photoshop (n/t) - ebnelson - 1/24/2004 2:58:36 AM
  - My entry in the contest! - Tom Brosz - 1/24/2004 11:05:42 PM
  - denile (n/t) - Nick - 1/24/2004 4:01:56 AM
    - Are you Egyptian? - ebnelson - 1/24/2004 5:17:55 AM
- Soviet Army fought UFOs - Nick - 1/24/2004 12:06:18 AM
  - re: UFOs - Interesting - Johannes - 1/24/2004 1:57:45 AM
    - An end to skepticism - ebnelson - 1/24/2004 3:00:31 AM
      - re: An end to skepticism - Johannes - 1/24/2004 4:23:37 AM
        
        Johanne, you and Nick are classic ufools - ebnelson - 1/24/2004 5:25:37 AM
        
        re: Johanne, you and Nick are classic ufools - Johannes - 1/24/2004 4:43:01 PM
        
        Nick was just having some fun.... - Gary - 1/24/2004 5:42:16 AM
        
        Thats not Nick Hoffman - Justin Kelly - 1/24/2004 4:25:23 PM
        
        Funny. We where having a poblem with another Gary awhile back. (n/t) - RobVG - 1/25/2004 1:42:02 AM
        
        Thanks Justin! I missed that too. Really cheeses me off when somebody uses a name already on the board. - Tom Brosz - 1/24/2004 10:43:35 PM
        
        I only post under seperate names because I have a split personality disorder. (n/t) - Abe E. Leaver - 1/27/2004 9:27:15 PM
        
        Opps, I meant to add... - Abe E. Leaver - 1/27/2004 9:35:30 PM
        
        Tell it to that damn Belgian! Justin its time for you to do something!! - R.L. - 1/25/2004 2:37:01 AM
        
        re: LOL LOL LOL:) (n/t) - Raoul Lannoy - 1/25/2004 10:42:41 AM
        
        re: names - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 3:42:54 AM
        
        The reason for that Tom.... - R.L. - 1/25/2004 4:10:15 AM
        
        Simple solution Raoul- Leave the L off your last name ;) (n/t) - THE legitimate R.L. - 1/25/2004 2:40:41 AM
        
        re: To annoy - Raoul Lannoy - 1/25/2004 4:56:46 PM
        
        Not annoyed at all - R.L. - 1/25/2004 7:31:46 PM
        
        If so, I stand humbled - ebnelson - 1/24/2004 5:53:08 AM
        
        Ed, I beg your pardon - Gary - 1/24/2004 7:34:00 AM
        
        Not even a problem, Greg - ebnelson - 1/25/2004 1:57:15 AM
        
        re: Not even a problem, : But still very interesting - Johannes - 1/25/2004 6:29:58 PM
        
        As long as someone is conscious - ebnelson - 1/25/2004 8:20:13 PM
        
        re: As long as someone is conscious - Johannes - 1/26/2004 5:53:16 AM
        
        You are so friggin' stupid - ebnelson - 1/27/2004 5:32:14 AM
        
        re: You are so friggin' stupid - Johannes - 1/27/2004 10:49:14 PM
      - fear (n/t) - Nick - 1/24/2004 4:17:10 AM
        
        re: Hmm-m -- dunno about that, Nick . . . - D. Spires - 1/24/2004 8:44:09 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (40 posts)