You are so friggin' stupid I have a compost heap in my backyard with more intellignece in the god damn mealy bugs and earthworms than you display here.
Why? Is it because I said that an object can "fly" without "propellers" or "engine", notice also that there are no "wings". Also notice that it is a vertical take off and landing, it also hovers.
What part of there is no fucking chance can't you understand? Your skull is so thick on this topic as to offer the possibility of a solid bone skull.
Hmmm..... Comparing the thickness of skull bones would be interesting, but it would deviate from the present topic.
And your link is to a company promoting a stunt demonstration device that uses well known (to non-morons) electrostatic forces to propel a device into the air. That is NOT anti-gravity.
Did I mention anywhere that it was antigravity?
Gravity is working on every molecule of that toy.
I agree.
It is a diversion designed to entertain normal people and to entice submorons.
I do not know the people and do not know "why" it was constructed, but the laws of physics are not being violated by a "wingless", and almost noiseless "hovering" object.
Instead of propellors, it is using electrostatic forces to draw air and to create upward pull sufficient to hold the very light weight frame up in the air.
Actually the operation is a little more complex than that. It starts off with the high voltage ionizing some air molecules, the ionized molecules have the same polarity of charge as the wire that ionized the molecule in the first place, since like charges repel, the ionized molecules are accelerated away from the wire and this action causes an opposite reaction to the wire. (In case you did not know, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.) Since the action is towards the ground the reaction is away from it. The power input (W=I*E) must be great enough to cause sufficient reaction so that the device is accelerated and overcomes the "pull" of gravity. In other words it operates on the principle of action/reaction same as any rocket.
Cute but no cigar. Ed
Back to my original question: (Using different words) IF I would take this (or some other idea) and would develop it to a stage where the device would resemble and operate according to the purported UFO's, then at what point of development would I get the "cigar"?
Johannes
PS. Perhaps there IS a way to compare the thickness of our skulls, I'd suggest that you drill a hole into yours and take an accurate measurement ..........naw........ .that would let the stale air out and it would pollute the atmosphere.
Flame » in reply to You are so friggin' stupid
re: You are so friggin' stupid
The whole thread (40 posts)
- UFO caught by city worker.
- Looks like an out-of focus bird in the foreground.
- im moving this to the flameboard(trash can) tomorrow
- Photoshop (n/t)
- Soviet Army fought UFOs
- re: UFOs - Interesting
- An end to skepticism
- re: An end to skepticism
- Johanne, you and Nick are classic ufools
- re: Johanne, you and Nick are classic ufools
- Nick was just having some fun....
- Thats not Nick Hoffman
- Funny. We where having a poblem with another Gary awhile back. (n/t)
- Thanks Justin! I missed that too. Really cheeses me off when somebody uses a name already on the board.
- If so, I stand humbled
- Thats not Nick Hoffman
- Johanne, you and Nick are classic ufools
- fear (n/t)
- re: An end to skepticism
- An end to skepticism
- re: UFOs - Interesting
