re: Oh , , ,

Flame » in reply to re: What -- question . . . ?

re: Oh , , ,

D. Spires — 2/2/2004 9:01:10 AM (archived)

I assume that you did not read all the posts so you missed the question, therefore I'll ask the question again.

I was replying to your first post in this thread, which included (n/t). You see, I thought you were reading this thread:

Flame board is badly backed up and threatening to overflow...might have to call in a professional... (n/t) - McFly - 1/28/2004 9:03:48 AM

If only Ed and Johannes would stop dropping those big floaters down there... (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/28/2004 1:11:56 PM

Sorry sorry sorry - ebnelson - 1/28/2004 7:19:58 PM

re: I thought that I asked a legitimate question. No one seems to be able to give a legitimate answer to it. (n/t) - Johannes - 1/29/2004 4:48:25 PM

re: What -- question . . . ? (n/t) - D. Spires - 1/31/2004 12:21:37 AM

Know that I see the mighty "question", I would have to say the answer is E.

And Tom is correct.

Cheers,
Dan

The whole thread (31 posts)

Flame board is badly backed up and threatening to overflow...might have to call in a professional... (n/t) - McFly - 1/28/2004 5:03:48 PM
- If only Ed and Johannes would stop dropping those big floaters down there... (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/28/2004 9:11:56 PM
  - Sorry sorry sorry - ebnelson - 1/29/2004 3:19:58 AM
    - re: I thought that I asked a legitimate question. No one seems to be able to give a legitimate answer to it. (n/t) - Johannes - 1/30/2004 12:48:25 AM
      - re: What -- question . . . ? (n/t) - D. Spires - 1/31/2004 8:21:37 AM
        
        re: What -- question . . . ? - Johannes - 2/1/2004 5:25:25 AM
        
        re: Oh , , , - D. Spires - 2/2/2004 9:01:10 AM
        
        re: Oh , , ,: I thought so: Thank you for your input. (n/t) - Johannes - 2/2/2004 5:32:31 PM
        
        re: What -- question . . . ? - Tom Brosz - 2/1/2004 5:37:48 AM
        
        re: Thanks for the answer Tom: Probably my question - Johannes - 2/1/2004 10:54:58 PM
        
        re: Thanks for the answer Tom: Probably my question - Tom Brosz - 2/2/2004 12:19:05 AM
        
        re: Thanks again Tom for the clarification. - Johannes - 2/2/2004 6:44:11 PM
        
        A little common sense... - Tom Brosz - 2/2/2004 7:49:14 PM
        
        Standing by the cracker barrel - ebnelson - 2/4/2004 5:16:15 AM
        
        re: Standing: Would you not admit that Adamski had imagination? (n/t) - Johannes - 2/4/2004 5:56:51 PM
        
        Adamski was a good con artist - ebnelson - 2/5/2004 4:26:32 AM
        
        re: Adamski was a good con artist - Johannes - 2/5/2004 7:01:46 AM
        
        To believe 'D' sincerely - ebnelson - 2/5/2004 1:06:45 PM
        
        re: To believe 'D' sincerely - Johannes - 2/6/2004 5:20:27 AM
        
        I would rather have a 'Star Trek' style space ship - ebnelson - 2/7/2004 5:52:23 AM
        
        re: I would rather have a 'Star Trek' style space ship - Johannes - 2/9/2004 5:41:03 PM
        
        re: No . . . - D. Spires - 2/12/2004 10:47:23 AM
        
        re: Dan, it seems obvious - Johannes - 2/13/2004 4:11:33 AM
        
        re: Uh-huh . . . - D. Spires - 2/15/2004 11:27:51 PM
        
        re: Of course they would be nice to have . . . - D. Spires - 2/6/2004 1:00:21 PM
        
        re: Of course:.. Then why not figure out how to make them? (n/t) - Johannes - 2/6/2004 6:46:41 PM
        
        re: That's what people are doing today . . . - D. Spires - 2/12/2004 8:01:02 AM
        
        re: A little common sense... - Johannes - 2/4/2004 4:03:32 AM
        
        Martians - RobVG - 2/3/2004 1:46:45 AM
        
        re: The Love War . . . - D. Spires - 2/3/2004 8:19:51 AM
        
        Missed that one. - RobVG - 2/8/2004 3:04:42 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (31 posts)