It was that it was sprung on a huge national audience during a show that was not advertised as prurient, or expected by reasonable people to be so.
That being said, the actual exposure as seen on TV was hardly worth mentioning, and nothing like the photos that were spread all over the Web later, including many--I might add--on sites that are not normally advertised as prurient or expected by reasonable people to be. Drudge, for example, posted not a link, but showed the shots on his opening page at first.
In addition, I don't think this is something that the FCC has to clamp down on with legal action. I mean, really. If the football league wants to take up a gripe with MTV, that can be done off screen, although if they hired MTV in the first place, then some of the idiocy begins at home.
I remember when the phrase "don't make a Federal case out of it" actually meant something.
Off Topic » in reply to I hear you guys. I just can't get it to make sense.
I don't think the problem was the exposure
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Could someone explain to me what ' wardrobe malfunction' is????
- This just won't go away.
- I jsut watched the funniest dry humor ever on the local Houston ABC affiliate
- When your tit hangs out on prime time network TV. n/t (n/t)
- ' wardrobe malfunction'
- re: ' wardrobe malfunction'
- There was a pastie
- I thought it was a ninja throwing star which had been flung at her from the audience, hit sideways and adhered because of all the sweat. (n/t)
- re: There was a pastie
- No children will be inspired to live a life of debauchery by the sight. No one will go blind.
- There was a pastie
- Yeah, leather is so delicate
- re: ' wardrobe malfunction'