Bush Doctrine v6.0

The Bush Doctrine: Preemptive invasion of nuclear-armed armed unarmed third world countries that will could "would love to" attack the US immediately soon, with nuclear weapons with bio or chem WMD if only they were armed.

I see no way in which something like things could apeal to anyone but a dilluded wing nut.

A. No one ever said Iraq was nuclear armed. -show me a report that says this

B. despite that some people like the mental image of us invading a poor unarmed country, Iraq was not. They did have tanks, they did have missiles and their soldiers did carry rifles and RPGs. Saying they were unarmed is comical to anyone who isn;t the most radical wing nut; they definitly were armed

regardless of any argument you try to make that says their tanks and missile were no mach for ours, they still by every conceivable definition of the word,were armed. To say they weren't is quite planly a lie. (how can some criticise Bush for lieing when they lie too?)

C. No one said iraq was going to attack us, -show me a report that says this

D. and while I agree they would have loved to, they Definitly could have as was evident when a handful of fanatics took down the world trade centers and dammaged the pentagon on a budget the fraction of one of Saddams many pallaces.

I might add that simply the proof of concept from 9/11 showed that the U.S. could not let stand any enemies with the income, or even the potential to copy this attack.

This argument is to put it frankly, trash, and is only fit for circle jerks.