Space/Science » in reply to Fundamentalism and Science

The whole thread (20 posts)

• Fundamentalism and Science - Raoul - 2/20/2004 10:01:21 PM
  • Dogma and (overly) esoteric science (a lengthy rant)... - JMS - 2/22/2004 9:33:05 PM
  • Some good points as far as he goes - ebnelson - 2/22/2004 12:43:20 AM
    • re: Kepler, Newton, Descartes - Raoul - 2/22/2004 2:01:19 PM
      • But in the secular prevalent world of today - ebnelson - 2/23/2004 12:55:40 AM
        • re: But in the secular prevalent world of today - Raoul - 2/23/2004 5:27:44 PM
  • re: Fundamentalism and Science - Bowser - 2/20/2004 11:07:40 PM
    • here's a charming example (probably belongs on flame or current events board) - Daniel - 2/22/2004 5:14:05 AM
    • re: Fundamentalism and Science - Raoul - 2/21/2004 12:08:47 AM
      • "the Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao" - JMS - 2/21/2004 5:40:33 AM
        • Plato - Scientist... - Adam - 2/22/2004 11:01:48 PM
          • I wanted Plato to go deeper into the cave (n/t) - JMS - 2/23/2004 3:13:16 AM
          • My Greek be a wee bit rusty - JMS - 2/23/2004 3:09:28 AM
        • re: Science - Raoul - 2/21/2004 10:39:32 AM
          • Connections - Bowser - 2/21/2004 5:16:36 PM
          • Schmitt's rock hammer - JMS - 2/21/2004 4:28:46 PM
            • re: Schmitt's rock hammer - Raoul - 2/21/2004 5:30:35 PM
        • "the Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao"- off topic - gbaikie - 2/21/2004 9:02:02 AM
          • The Fundaments of Fundamentalism - Nick Hoffman - 2/21/2004 12:55:56 PM
            • re: The Fundaments of Fundamentalism - Tom Brosz - 2/21/2004 8:57:55 PM