Geek Speak — HabitableZone

Geek Speak » in reply to re: "Soft" manuals

re: "Soft" manuals

There's something comforting about the heft of a good, solid manual, isn't there? And if 1) you don't have a functioning computer, or 2) you wanna read in the john, a printed manual is more-or-less mandatory.

I've been getting fonder of pdf manuals, though (when properly indexed, much preferred over their html counterparts, though chm files ain't so bad). I like to be able to copy-n-paste sections to which I frequently refer into a kind of mini-manual, which can be nicely printed if need be. One can always photocopy from the original printed documentation, of course, but I don't find that as elegant a solution. I've even resorted to taking screen-caps of the relevant pages of a pdf manual and stitching the bits together in photoshop (it's easier with Acrobat writer, though).

I also really apprecitate that a pdf manual can be backed-up quickly and reliably onto both a harddrive and another cd (I'm a real beleiver in the notion that until you've got three copies of something, you don't really have it at all).

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (5 posts)