February 27, 2004
Ottawa affirms commitment to missile defence talks
Nunavut high on list of possible missile, radar sites
JANE GEORGE
Despite growing controversy in Ottawa, the federal government reaffirmed its
commitment this week to talks about becoming involved in the U.S. missile
defence scheme.
On Tuesday, a motion from the Bloc Québécois calling for the federal
government to "cease all discussions with the Bush administration on possible
Canadian participation" in missile defence was defeated 155 to 71 in the House
of Commons.
Canada is talking with the U.S. about participation in a missile system that
would theoretically fend off attacks by so-called "rogue" countries such as
North Korea or Iran by knocking out these missiles with other ballistic missiles
over northern North America.
During a debate last week in Parliament on missile defence, MP Claude
Bachand, defense critic for the BQ, said the Liberal government was heading
down a "slippery slope" with the ballistic missile defence (BMD) system.
"The federal government's proposal is the new foreign affairs doctrine: total
domination. Domination by air, by land by sea, and by space," Bachand said.
"Canada is in the process of jumping on the American bandwagon."
Bachand said the BQ is handing out 20,000 postcards with an anti-missile
defence message, so Quebeckers can tell their elected representatives to
oppose the system.
If Canada eventually decides to back involvement in BMD, Nunavut may find
missiles and radar in its backyard.
Last week, federal defence minister David Pratt refused to rule out U.S.-
controlled missile launches from northern Canada as part of the missile
defence shield.
"We're not saying no. We're not saying yes," Pratt said on the CTV program,
Question period.
Pratt later said that the "possible use of Canadian territory for radar sites"
might be Canada's contribution to the multi-billion-dollar BMD, although he
said it was too early to tell whether any use of Canadian territory would be
needed.
"I would simply say that what we are looking at is a limited system of land- and
sea-based interceptors," Pratt said in the House of Commons.
But Greenland has been less than keen about letting the U.S. upgrade its Thule
air base in north Greenland into a BMD site, and has demanded compensation
and a voice at the table during negotiations.
So, northern Canada is the next logical place for the installation of missile and
radar sites, anywhere in a line down from Alert to Goose Bay, Labrador.
To make the proposed system work, the U.S. must have radar and missile sites
circling the Arctic because two or three missile radar sites would be necessary
to cover the intercept line for missiles headed toward the U.S. east coast.
Based on missile trajectory maps, these sites could be located at Alert in North
Baffin, Iqaluit, or Goose Bay.
At a meeting in Ottawa on Arctic sovereignty and security in January, 2002,
Lt. General George MacDonald, who was then the vice-chief of Canada's
defence staff, said he wouldn't rule out Ellesmere Island for a BMD site.
The abandoned mine site at Nanisivik as well as bases at Eureka and Alert on
Ellesmere Island could be possible alternatives to Thule.
Dale Grant, editor of the Defence Policy Review bulletin told Nunatsiaq News
in May 2002 the "battle management headquarters" could be located in Goose
Bay as a way of sealing the southern border of the BMD system - a plan that
would also assure the future of the base, which is an economic force in
Labrador.
Fort Greeley, a former U.S. Army facility 200 kilometres southeast of
Fairbanks, Alaska, is already slated for five missile silos, which will be part of
the Pacific test bed that the U.S. Missile Defense Agency will have running by
September 2004. The U.S. is also considering arming these missiles with
nuclear warheads.
Yukon MP Larry Bagnell, also the parliamentary secretary to the minister of
Indian Affairs and Northern Development, said Yukoners are split on the BMD.
"There are a number of Yukoners who think that Canada should not participate,
but we are the closest riding to the system. We are a few seconds away from
the missiles at Fort Greely. Therefore, a number of Yukoners feel that, without
spending any money, we should be at the table so we know what is happening."
source
Ottawa affirms commitment to missile defence talks, Nunavut high on list of possible missile, radar sites
The whole thread (29 posts)
- Ottawa affirms commitment to missile defence talks, Nunavut high on list of possible missile, radar sites
- - I can see that (as you mentioned) you are indeed on holidays ..
- re: Canada's Policy on Ballistic Missile Defence
- re: That the Senate of Canada recommend that the Government of Canada refuse to participate in the U.S.- sponsored Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) system, because:
- re: Church leaders encourage alternatives to Ballistic Missile Defence System
- I was going to comment on this at some point in the thread...
- re: Northrop Grumman team to develop boost-phase ABM system
- re:BMD, NORAD, and Canada-US security
- re: NORAD: D.C. airways still vulnerable
- re: NORAD could evolve into N.A. NATO: U.S. military leader
- re: NORAD: D.C. airways still vulnerable
- re:BMD, NORAD, and Canada-US security
- re: Church leaders encourage alternatives to Ballistic Missile Defence System
- re: That the Senate of Canada recommend that the Government of Canada refuse to participate in the U.S.- sponsored Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) system, because:
